Mechanical vs manual CPR compressions

Description

Meta-analysis of the available research looks at primary and secondary patient outcomes of applying mechanical CPR compression devices following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CPR in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Man vs Machine - REBEL EM - Emergency Medicine Blog

Lifeline ARM XR ACC, RCF-A2000EN - Defibtech - New

Comparative Hemodynamic Evaluation of the LUCAS® Device and Manual Chest Compression in Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Mechanical CPR Devices - The current evidence

Differences between manual CPR and corpuls cpr in regard to quality and outcome: study protocol of the comparing observational multi‐center prospective registry study on resuscitation (COMPRESS)

Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial - The Lancet

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest - Wang, PL - 2018

Mechanical CPR, Balloon Tamponade, and Advocacy – FOAMcast

Robot paramedics' are being used in the UK to carry out CPR on patients in ambulances

News Sunlife Science

Rescue under ongoing CPR from an upper floor: evaluation of three different evacuation routes and mechanical and manual chest compressions: a manikin trial, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

$ 23.00USD
Score 4.9(463)
In stock
Continue to book