We take it for granted that every state has two representatives in the United States Senate. Apply the "one person, one vote" standard, however, and the Senate is the most malapportioned legislature in the democratic world.But does it matter that California’s 32 million people have the same number of Senate votes as Wyoming’s 480,000? Frances Lee and Bruce Oppenheimer systematically show that the Senate’s unique apportionment scheme profoundly shapes legislation and representation. The size of a state’s population affects the senator-constituent relationship, fund-raising and elections, strategic behavior within the Senate, and, ultimately, policy decisions. They also show that less populous states consistently receive more federal funding than states with more people. In sum, Lee and Oppenheimer reveal that Senate apportionment leaves no aspect of the institution untouched.This groundbreaking book raises new questions about one of the key institutions of American government and will interest anyone concerned with issues of representation.
Frances Lee Center for the Study of Democratic Politics (CSDP)
A system under strain: Is US democracy showing real cracks?
Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal
How The House Got Stuck At 435 Seats
Reassessing the Facts about Inequality, Poverty, and
Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests - Michael D. Minta, Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, 2013
The Party or the Purse? Unequal Representation in the US Senate
Social Sciences, Free Full-Text
What's Going On in This Graph? Senate Representation by State
Democracy Lane Kenworthy
Senate Gives Small States Power Beyond Their Size - The New York Times
